A few aspects of your application need to be considered when selecting an electronic examiner. Each reviewer will receive a structured electronic format template. This template provides a step-by–step guide to organizing the review. It will also provide information about the conflict of interests of the electronic reviewer. A well-structured electronic review is the key to a quality application.
Electronic template structure
The Structured electronic reviewer template was developed to help the reviewer structure their reviews. It helps reviewers focus their attention on the main findings and points. It also indicates any referee issues that may be relevant for the article. It is used by reviewers for providing feedback on submitted manuscripts.
The journal's Structured electronic reviewing template was launched in August 2010. There have been more than 80 reviews since the introduction this new process. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of the structured electronic reviewer template on manuscript reviews.
Conflicts of interest for electronic reviewers
Electronic reviewers should be aware of any potential conflict of interest and declare it to the journal. Conflict of interest occurs when an author has an interest that could affect the ability to give a fair, objective evaluation of the work. Relevant commercial relationships include research grants, grants, materials and in-kind.
A reviewer's personal or business relationships can create conflicts of interest. Conflicts of interest can result from academic competition or personal relationships.